|
||||||||||
| Introduction | Background | Towards an electronic commerce policy for South Africa | Conclusion | Author biography | ||||||||||
| 1. Introduction | ||||||||||
|
The concept
of electronic commerce is certainly not new.1
Business to business e-commerce has been an enabler
for competitiveness for a number of years. EDI was
the predominant standard that allowed business to business e-commerce.
However, it can probably be argued that two drivers have contributed
significantly to the exponential growth of e-commerce world-wide: convergence
and the Internet.
With
the convergence of telecommunications, broadcasting and information
technologies, the infrastructure capable of handling electronic commerce
has become almost ubiquitous in developed countries. This has afforded
a critical mass of businesses and consumers access to communications
infrastructure.
Probably
more important was the emergence of the Internet as the preferred networking
protocol. This allowed open standards to be developed where transactions
could take place between parties that have not developed proprietary
protocols or have developed set agreements on transactions. This has
allowed anybody who has access to the Internet to transact with an entity
selling services or goods over the Internet.
It has been argued that e-commerce is likely to be a factor in the emergence of the information society. Mansell and Wehn argue that countries that do not implement electronic business networks will almost certainly find themselves disadvantaged in the conduct of trade and in their financial affairs.2 There is a real risk that developing countries will enter into a neo-apartheid era, in that the world community will be split between the advantaged who have access to information and can engage in the information society, and those who do not. South Africa can, by developing appropriate and supporting policy and regulatory infrastructures, promote access to the information society and more important allow its people to benefit economically from emerging technologies. 97 South
Africa has strong First World and developing world components. The banking
sector has some of the most sophisticated information
technology infrastructures world-wide, whereas the majority of small,
medium and micro-enterprises have little or no access to IT systems.
In civil society conditions are worse. Access to telecommunications
facilities in rural areas is very limited.
The
South African government has realised that access to the information
society will be key in the upliftment of its people. In the Science
and Technology White Paper,3 the development
of policies in support of the information society is considered a high
priority. Unfortunately, little progress has been made in terms of the
development of policy and regulatory frameworks since the White Paper
was issued.
One
of the national priorities in South Africa is achieving a better life
for all citizens. The objective articulated in the Science and Technology
process is to establish policy frameworks that can tap into the potential
of e-commerce as an enabler in improving life for
South Africas citizens. This chapter describes the initiative
in terms of international events and drivers that led up to the e-commerce
policy process, and the process of working towards an e-commerce policy
for South Africa.
|
||||||||||
| 2. Background | ||||||||||
| 2.1 A short history | ||||||||||
|
On the
international front, e-commerce has been high on the agenda of several
countries and international organisations.
The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), the UN body most concerned with e-commerce, has for some time been working on the legal consequences of the development of e-commerce. In 1996 the Model Law on Electronic Commerce was finalised. It comprises model provisions for legislators to adopt when considering how to ensure that e-commerce is legally recognised. The Model Law covers, for example, the legal recognition of electronic writing and signatures.
98 During the mid-1990s three predominant positions emerged globally:
The United States
and the European Union released a joint statement
on
In May 1998 the
World Trade Organization declared its intention
to establish a WTO work programme for e-commerce.
This work programme will examine all trade-related issues relating
to global e-commerce, including the issues Business leaders from the US and Japan issued a joint statement on e-commerce in July 1998. 99
|
||||||||||
| 2.2 The OECD Ministerial on Electronic Commerce | ||||||||||
|
In October 1998, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) convened a conference with the theme A Borderless World: Realising the potential of Global Electronic Commerce, in Ottawa, Canada.
The conference reflected growing recognition of the need to create the right global framework to harness the enormous economic potential of e-commerce and to ensure its continued growth in a socially responsible manner. Building on the results of a previous OECD conference held in Turku, Finland, in November 1997 and on the European Ministerial Conference in Bonn, Germany in July 1997, governments, the private sector and social interests met in Ottawa to advance their common commitment to create a certain, secure and predictable international environment for the conduct of e-commerce.4 The Ottawa Conference took specific steps to establish the cornerstones for the future growth of trans-national electronic commerce. Government representatives, business, and labour and NGO leaders considered the economic and social potential of e-commerce, the barriers that currently limit this potential, and solutions that may be employed. Participants identified the following elements towards a shared vision for global e-commerce: 100
The Conference
identified the challenges implied by maximising the benefits of global
e-commerce and clarified roles, responsibilities
and commitments in terms of an action plan for global e-commerce. Delegates
agreed:
101 Participants also
acknowledged that partnership among all parties is a cornerstone of the
fulfilment of this vision, and sets the stage for the development of solutions
to problems that confront e-commerce.
The OECD Ottawa
Ministerial Conference on electronic commerce broke new ground for the
OECD and the global community in creating new working partnerships between
governments, the private sector, consumer and social interest groups,
and among international organisations. Continuing efforts to enhance and
develop these partnerships will be critical to the growth of global e-commerce
and the contribution of the OECD. Having said this, the OECD is still
a body representative of the 29 most economically developed countries.
In the words of Jay Naidoo:
The Conference
Conclusions were significant in that conference participants
ministers, business representatives, labour, and social interest groups
came to agreement on the formal outcome of the Ottawa Ministerial.
The conclusions outline a shared vision for global e-commerce, the commitments
and priorities of each party to implement that vision, and the next steps.
Three action-oriented
documents, which outline for the first time who is doing what to solve
these various problems, were tabled:
Together, the reports highlight the potential and value of co-operative efforts while, at the same time, exploiting the relative strengths of the various organisations involved. Ministerial Declarations to establish baseline principles and goals and provide guidance regarding the OECDs further work on privacy, consumer protection, and authentication were adopted, and several agreements and a work plan for taxation issues were reached. 102 Under these broad
themes, several issues were discussed, as listed below.
103
The outcomes of
the OECD conference represent a synthesis of the different positions developed
by the US, EU and MITI. More importantly, according to Donald Johnson,
OECD Secretary General, This conference has been a major launching
pad to establish an international framework for the evolution of electronic
commerce in all its various dimensions.
Although the OECD
positions cannot be enforced, it is likely that the conference will significantly
influence the WTOs deliberations on e-commerce.
From the South
African perspective, it is thus key that careful consideration should
be given to the outcomes of this conference.
Various issues
were discussed at the conference, much of which remained unresolved. However,
two matters that are relevant to South Africa should be noted. First,
OECD countries business people argued strongly for self-regulatory
structures for e-commerce. Second, although some developing countries
were invited as observers, the positions developed are from a predominantly
First World perspective. How do we harness
this Internet to empower our people, to constitute... the most powerful
democratising medium in the world that can empower and liberate our people
from the shackles of poverty, ignorance and of dictatorships? was
a question posed by South Africas then Telecommunications and Broadcasting
Minister, Jay Naidoo, at the conference. The answers are not simple, and
this is in part why a process has been established to tackle the issues
of e-commerce and create an appropriate framework for finding answers.
|
||||||||||
| 2.3 Events in South Africa | ||||||||||
|
The current legal and regulatory framework in South Africa poses significant problems for legally transacting via electronic means. A typical example is the purchasing of goods or services via the Internet with credit cards. 104 In South Africa,
various national departments have responsibility for the
Because the responsibility for the various elements of e-commerce lay in different departments, little progress was made towards a consistent set of polices for e-commerce in South Africa. In May
1998 the Department of Communications, having received
the mandate to do so, established an Information
Technology investment cluster. The main objective of this cluster was
to develop coherent legislation on issues related to the information society.
A government
task team was established to develop a discussion document that would
facilitate debates on e-commerce both in the national and international
arena. This document would form the basis of discussion for the development
of an e-commerce policy and subsequent legislation, via a Green Paper
and subsequent White Paper.
The next section describes the development of this Discussion Document. 105 |
||||||||||
| 3. Towards an electronic commerce policy for South Africa | ||||||||||
| 3.1 Developing policy in South Africa | ||||||||||
|
Policies are developed in South Africa through the process of Green and White Papers. Because of the intensive and democratic process of consultation, the policy process will take approximately two years to complete. It is divided into three phases:
|
||||||||||
| 3.2 The Electronic Commerce Discussion Document | ||||||||||
|
The South African government has approached the development of e-commerce policy with the following objectives in mind.6 The government needs to:
In reviewing and developing policies regarding e-commerce, the government will pursue the following activities:
106 |
||||||||||
| 3.3 Discussion Document development process | ||||||||||
|
These are the objectives
of the Discussion Document and the process can be summarised as follows.
First, inform and
raise awareness in government. E-commerce has received relatively little
attention in government circles up to now. Neither e-commerce nor its
impact on policies in South Africa has been extensively investigated,
and thus it could be said that it is not well understood. In order to
address this, the development process must be designed so that it will
inform and educate government.
For this reason
it was decided that government officials from all those departments that
will influence or be influenced by government policy should participate
in the development of the Discussion Document. A core task team was identified
to drive the process.
Second, use the
existing international body of work to leapfrog learning. Significant
research has been done and is still in progress on e-commerce policy.
South Africa does not have the resources to research all aspects of
e-commerce. From this perspective, it is imperative that existing work be investigated to accelerate the learning. Two approaches have been followed to harness international experience:
107 It was decided
that the OECD position would be used as departure point for the development
of the South African view. The OECD position provides a framework for
debate where issues pertaining specifically to the South African environment
could be highlighted and debated both nationally and internationally.
As mentioned, the
process designed for the development of the e-commerce Discussion Document
has as its framework the OECD document outlining a global action plan
for electronic commerce, as prepared by business with recommendations
from governments. This creates a common frame of reference that is already
accepted as an international approach. The additional focus on understanding
the marketplace and the legislative frameworks currently in place add
to the understanding of that framework, but are highlighted as of importance
in the South African context.
|
||||||||||
| 3.4 Unique issues for South Africa | ||||||||||
|
A number of issues
have surfaced in the course of the process, which are
108
109 |
||||||||||
| 3.5 Stakeholder analysis | ||||||||||
|
South Africa, like most other countries, will have a complex stakeholder environment in which e-commerce has an impact or will be deployed. The accompanying table shows current stakeholder groupings and specific issues pertaining to each. The further process will need to take into account the complex mix of agendas and needs to ensure that the final legislation in regard to enabling and regulating e-commerce will meet all these requirements optimally. This has specific implications for the manner in which the Discussion Document will be published and communicated, and the manner in which each stakeholder grouping is included in the Green Paper process. 110 The above segmentation of the marketplace is only one cut, and quite simplistic. It is clear that there is a great need to engage the various stakeholders to ensure that all needs and points of view are correctly interpreted in the policy-making process. Thus a more detailed analysis resulting in defining strategies to engage each group must still be undertaken. |
||||||||||
| 3.6 Learning | ||||||||||
|
A number of aspects of the process and the content of the Discussion Document that is being developed have led to learning that is useful. These include:
111 |
||||||||||
| 4. Conclusion | ||||||||||
|
The development
of enabling policies and regulatory infrastructures in support of the
emerging information society is arguably the most important initiative
that can now be embarked on by governments, both in the developed and
developing worlds. For this reason, it has to be ensured that processes
are followed to produce quality products while utilising scarce resources.
This chapter outlined the approach taken by South Africa, and has articulated
the status, insights and learning derived from the process thus far.
Clearly there is
still a long journey ahead, and much to be learned and done. The levels
of debate that will be engaged in will hopefully be high and there is
great hope that e-commerce will have the impact it promises on improving
life for South Africas citizens.
|
||||||||||
|
Acronyms
used
ACB Clearance
Bank
COSAB Chamber
of South African Banks
DACST Department
of Arts, Culture, Science and Technology
DOC Department
of Communications
DOF Department
of Finance
DOJ Department
of Justice
DPSA Department
of Public Service and Administration
DTI Department
of Trade and Industry
DOW Department
of Welfare
ISPs Internet
service providers
NGO Non-government
organisation
NTSIKA SME
facilitation structure
SACOB South
African Chamber of Business
SACSA South
African Communications Security Agency
SALC South
African Law Commission
SARB South
African Reserve Bank
SARS South
African Revenue Service
SITA State
IT Agency
SME Small
and medium-sized companies
VANS Value
Added Network Service providers
|
||||||||||
|
112 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||